Why is intracellular testing better in these cases? You're talking about versus serum, I'm presuming. Sorry, I should say. Yeah. Why is intracellular testing better than uh better than cellular? Well, intracellular is better at looking at vitamins, minerals, antioxidants, and amino acid levels. And it's a lot more accurate and formative than serum
levels. Also, um they are felt much earlier and are low on these tests weeks or even months, even sometimes years ahead of a ahead of the drop in serum levels. Plus, they are a ton cheaper um to get than the serum levels if you're
paying cash for them. So, serum levels for these 100 supplements would when I did the math, I was using one of the labs we use push upwards of $50,000 or more. last time I checked and probably 30 or so of the antioxidants these guys test for just could not be readily run
Most doctors run standard serum blood tests, see a "normal" nutrient level, and send you home. But measuring floating nutrients in your liquid serum is like looking at the paint on a house to see if the plumbing works inside. After reviewing over 40,000 advanced intracellular vitamin lab panels, the truth is clear: intracellular glutathione vs serum levels tell two entirely different stories. Your serum can look completely fine while your cells are completely depleted of the master antioxidant needed to protect your life. The Cytokine Threat When methylation breaks down and homocysteine elevat
